Enter your search term above.

News

Marlene Nadler-Moodie passed away on March 9, 2021. Marlene was a nationally distinguished leader in the field of psychiatric nursing and was dedicated to helping others who were dealing with a cancer diagnosis.


August 2016

I was diagnosed with stage 3B non-small cell adenocarcinoma in June of 2012 after visiting the doctor for a dry cough. I was blindsided because I felt healthy, exercised daily and was an avid traveler. Lung cancer was not on my radar.

Since then, my treatment has been ongoing. Initially, I had two cycles of IV chemotherapy and two cycles of oral chemotherapy, combined with 7 ½ weeks of daily radiation. My second line of treatment was Tarceva, which I was on until switching to Opdivo. I recently participated in a clinical trial, but it was not successful for me. I just began another round of chemotherapy and will go through a few cycles and then another CT scan to see if my condition is stabilizing.

Fortunately, I have had very few side effects throughout treatment and have continued to work. Maintaining my usual busy lifestyle has been important to me. I am a clinical nurse specialist in psychiatric nursing and completed a 3-year term as President of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association. I’m still focused on travel, and have traveled with my family out of the country more than 15 times in the four years since my diagnosis.

Life has been good. I have a fervent desire to live each day as fully as possible, staying as healthy as I can. Managing all the tests, treatments, and side effects while trying to live “normally” is my constant challenge.

I have been blessed with a great support system. First has been my wonderful husband, who although quite shocked and saddened by my diagnosis, has been a constant partner. My sons and their significant others, friends and colleagues have also been a strong source of support. I am also grateful for my wonderful physician, Scott Godfrey. He is my oncologist at Kaiser and has been my treatment ally from day one.

To others facing lung cancer, I’d say that there are a number of new treatments arriving and there is a rush to discover more. It’s important to know that a cancer diagnosis is not an immediate death sentence. You may do well with the treatment options available. Learn the most you can about your disease, be proactive, try everything, and keep yourself healthy and busy. Do what you love. Try something new. Do not spend each day dying – spend it living!

Shortly after I was diagnosed four years ago, I looked for ways to get involved. I was disturbed by the lack of research dollars for lung cancer, which is related to the unfortunate stigma associated with the disease. I found out that there was a Free to Breathe walk here in San Diego and quickly got involved. My team is Marlene’s Wish and I’m proud to have been a fundraising “winner” in some of the past years. It’s important to me to raise money and awareness for lung cancer research.

As a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Texas’ MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dr. Warren L. Denning has had his fair share of opportunities to work with some of the world’s leading cancer researchers. Dr. Denning, a 2014 LCRF Grant awardee, also received the prestigious LCRF Scientific Merit Award. The award is given to the researcher who achieves the highest overall merit score as determined by the Lung Cancer Research Foundation (LCRF) Medical Advisory Board. Dr. Denning follows in the footsteps of colleague, Dr. Faye Johnson, the 2013 LCRF Scientific Merit Award winner.

Quick Facts

Name: Warren L. Denning, PhD

Institution: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Education: BS, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
PhD, University of Alabama, Birmingham

Research Focus: Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

As a post-doctoral fellow at the University of Texas’ MD Anderson Cancer Center, Dr. Warren L. Denning has had his fair share of opportunities to work with some of the world’s leading cancer researchers. Dr. Denning, a 2014 LCRF Grant awardee, also received the prestigious LCRF Scientific Merit Award. The award is given to the researcher who achieves the highest overall merit score as determined by the Lung Cancer Research Foundation (LCRF) Medical Advisory Board. Dr. Denning follows in the footsteps of colleague, Dr. Faye Johnson, the 2013 LCRF Scientific Merit Award winner.

Dr. Denning’s LCRF funded project, entitled, ‘CAR Modified T Cells as a Novel Immunotherapy to Eliminate Lung Cancer,’ will attempt to develop a novel way to treat small cell lung cancer (SCLC) by modifying a patient’s own immune system. Specifically, Dr. Denning and his team hope to engineer a patient’s T cell with a receptor to recognize and eliminate the tumor by binding to a specific surface protein. Essentially, the research project is looking to give the immune system ‘eyes’ to better detect, bind to, and eliminate cancer cells.

From early in his career, Dr. Denning has been interested and involved with cancer research. But it wasn’t until his time as a post-doctoral fellow that he focused his attention on lung cancer.

“Given the size and diversity of people lung cancer affects, it is an important area for research not only because different treatments have developed to suit so many different patients, but also because lung cancer can arise due to many different factors,” Denning said. “I believe understanding that factor of diversity will also help inform treatments for other cancer types as well.”

Dr. Denning celebrated Lung Cancer Awareness Month at the Foundation’s Ninth Annual Lung Cancer Awareness Luncheon earlier this month in New York City. At the event, Dr. Denning accepted the Merit Award and praised the LCRF’s great work in funding critical lung cancer research.

“The award of this grant is a firm step toward my development as an independent researcher,” Denning told an audience of more than 300 supporters. “All LCRF grants represent an opportunity to turn good ideas into good therapies, a chance to make the ephemeral actual, and bring a part of the future into the present – and that is powerful.”

Dr. Denning is one of 20 recipients of $1 million in lung cancer research funding. All applications for grants are reviewed by the LCRF’s esteemed Medical Advisory Board and approved by Board of Directors.

For more information about the LCRF Research Grant Program, please click here.

Ms. Miles, a recipient of a 2014 LCRF Research Grant, is a current PhD student at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD. She is currently completing her program studies at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in New York City, one of the most esteemed cancer centers in the world.

Quick Facts

Name: Linde Miles

Institution: Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

Education: BS, Penn State University
PhD Candidate, Johns Hopkins University

Research Focus: Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)

Ms. Miles, a recipient of a 2014 LCRF Research Grant, is a current PhD student at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, MD. She is currently completing her program studies at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) in New York City, one of the most esteemed cancer centers in the world.

After losing her grandfather to small cell lung cancer, Ms. Miles grew particularly interested in cancer research. She majored in biochemistry/molecular biology during her undergraduate studies at Penn State University, and ultimately became drawn to the discovery and characterization of new and effective therapies that could help patients.

“When I started rotations during my doctoral studies at Johns Hopkins, the lung cancer research occurring really piqued my interest,” Miles said. “The lab was taking bench research and translating them directly into the clinic. I was able to join the lab and really have the opportunity to focus on a cancer that had affected my family personally.”

The lab she is referring to is led by none other than Dr. Charles M. Rudin, Chief of Thoracic Oncology Service at MSKCC and member of the LCRF Medical Advisory Board. Dr. Rudin, who also was the keynote speaker at the Ninth Annual Lung Cancer Awareness Luncheon earlier this month, has been a mentor to many, including Ms. Miles.

“Dr. Rudin encourages his students to really become independent researchers, guiding and managing our projects,” she said.

Ms. Miles’ LCRF funded study focuses around a virus that selectively infects and kills small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cells while sparing normal cells. The goal of the project is to identify the proteins important in viral infection using two complimentary techniques which create cells with gene knockout and subsequently protein knockouts of every gene in the human genome. After the generation of these cells, any cells that have a gene knockout occurring in protein that is essential for the virus to enter the cell will now be resistant to and survive infection by the virus. Once she and her team is able to identify the genes responsible, they can characterize the proteins important for viral infection and ultimately identify biomarkers on a patient’s tumor that will determine if the patient will benefit from virotherapy.

Lung cancer is the most deadly cause of cancer death and the second most common form of cancer in both men and women, yet it remains significantly underfunded. Researchers like Ms. Miles depend on private funding from organizations like the LCRF to allow their work to continue.

“Funding allows researchers to continue ongoing projects, follow-up on new discoveries or observations, and even start new and exciting projects from scratch,” Ms. Miles said.

Ms. Miles’ project was selected from a pool of over 100 applicants, many of whom have years of research under their belts, including both doctoral and medical degrees. As a graduate student, Ms. Miles is grateful to the LCRF for offering one of few opportunities to apply for funding.

“I was looking forward to applying for funding from the LCRF as it was one of very few opportunities for graduate students to apply directly for funding for their own research projects,” she said. “I knew that these grant applications were very competitive and researchers with all levels of experience would be applying. It is such a great honor to have my grant awarded funding among all of the other exceptional grants.”

Ms. Miles is one of 20 recipients of $1 million in lung cancer research funding. All applications for grants are reviewed by the LCRF’s esteemed Medical Advisory Board and approved by Board of Directors.

For more information about the LCRF Research Grant Program, please click here.

NEW YORK (November 12, 2014): The Lung Cancer Research Foundation (LCRF) strongly supports the recent proposal issued by The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to begin covering lung cancer screening tests for high risk patients.

Lung cancer kills nearly 160,000 Americans each year and claims more lives than any other cancer. Although survival rates have increased over the years, lung cancer remains so deadly in part because of the lack of early screening and prevention.

A recent major research study concluded that low-dose CT screenings for individuals at high- risk have the potential to dramatically increase lung cancer survival rates. This proposal offers coverage to certain high-risk Medicare recipients up to the age of 74. To be eligible, Medicare patients would be current smokers or have quit within the last 15 years, and have a 30-pack-per-year smoking history.

“Research continues to provide us with groundbreaking strategies for improving care and outcomes,” said LCRF Board of Directors Chairman, Pippa Gerard. “We applaud the collective efforts of the government and the lung cancer community for pushing this forward, especially during Lung Cancer Awareness Month. This continued progress has the potential to save thousands of lives.”

Dr. Jim Dougherty, Chair of the LCRF Medical Advisory Board, echoed support for the proposed coverage. “Low dose CT scans for high risk patients is a critical step in reducing mortality from the disease.”

According to the Associated Press, the proposal is open for public comment for 30 days and would not become final until February. However, such draft decisions are rarely reversed and public health experts do not expect any changes to the main elements.

For more information and to read the complete NY Times press release, please click here.

On September 21, 2014, The New York Times featured “A Cancer Battle We Can Win,” by Andrea McKee and Andrew Salner, in The Opinion Pages, bringing national attention to lung cancer.

Dr. McKee is the chairwomen of the department of radiation oncology at Lahey Hospital and Medical Center in Peabody, MA. Dr. Andrew Salner is the radiation oncology chief at Hartford Hospital.

Below is the complete article.


A Cancer Battle We Can Win
By Andrea McKee and Andrew Salner
NY Times – September 21, 2014

THE war against cancer can be confusing, with providers, insurers and policy makers debating the effectiveness of treatments, prevention programs and research. But there is one significant victory within our grasp. There is, increasingly, a consensus that CT screening for lung cancer can save thousands of lives each year.

Lung cancer, the No. 1 cancer killer, claims the lives of approximately 435 people in the United States every day. In fact, more women die of lung cancer each year than breast, ovarian and uterine cancers combined. While lung cancer is curable with surgery in its early stages, most people are given diagnoses of lung cancer after symptoms develop, when the disease is often advanced and resistant to treatment.

Now, however, there is good evidence that we can reduce the number of people who die of this devastating disease. A recent study called the National Lung Screening Trial proved that we do that by using a low-dose CT scan to detect early stage lung cancer. The study showed that in older people, both current and former heavy smokers, annual screening reduced the number of deaths from lung cancer by 20 percent.

Dozens of medical organizations, including the United States Preventive Services Task Force, now recommend CT lung screening for high-risk individuals. Approximately nine million Americans meet the task force’s criteria for high risk: current smokers between 55 and 80 who have smoked, on average, at least one pack of cigarettes a day for 30 years, or former smokers in that age range who smoked that much and quit within the last 15 years. The recommendation carries significant weight. And the screenings will be more affordable for those who want them because the Affordable Care Act requires that all private insurers cover CT lung screening for those at high risk with no co-pay, starting in January 2015.

By November of this year, the federal agency that administers Medicare will decide whether it should provide CT lung screening coverage for the Medicare beneficiaries at high risk, estimated to be between three and four million people. Since a CT lung screening exam can cost several hundred dollars, that coverage would ensure that millions of high-risk Americans over 65 would get lifesaving intervention regardless of income level.

Many hospitals have started successful CT lung screening programs. Lahey Hospital and Medical Center in Burlington, Mass., has offered CT lung screening since January 2012. We provide the exam free to all qualified high-risk individuals. Over the past two and half years we have screened more than 2,500 men and women and have detected more than 40 cases of lung cancer. Three out of four of these lung cancers have been Stage I, the most curable stage of the disease.

CT lung screening is also offered free at several Connecticut hospitals in the Hartford HealthCare system. The hospitals range from a large, urban 867-bed academic medical center to a small, 144-bed hospital serving a more rural population. Over the last 10 months, this diverse group of hospitals has performed more than 600 CT lung screening exams with early results matching those of the national trial.

We can achieve a solid win against cancer. CT lung screening for high-risk populations, with high quality standards, is ready for prime time. The government should move quickly to cover this lifesaving intervention for Medicare users.

NEW YORK, AUGUST 14, 2014 – LCRF funded researcher, James Welsh of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, was part of novel research study that may lead to therapeutic strategies for the treatment of lung cancer in the future.

Welsh received a $50,000 grant from LCRF in 2010 for his project entitled, “Developing a New Method of Reducing Resistance to Lung Cancer Therapy.” Other project sponsors included the National Cancer Institute (NCI), the family of M. Adnan Hamed, and the Orr Family Foundation to MD Anderson’s Cancer Center’s Thoracic Radiation Oncology program.

This study focused on therapeutic resistance, especially in lung cancer patients. Resistance to current treatment types is the primary factor that limits the effectiveness of therapies for solid tumors, including lung cancer. This concept is particularly common for overcoming resistance to ionizing radiation, which is currently the only potentially curative nonsurgical approach for solid tumors, including nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Current treatment for NSCLC often leads to resistance and reoccurrence of the disease. In an attempt to improve outcomes in such cases, Welsh and the team studied agents that target signaling pathways that mediate treatment resistance.

Prior research has revealed that the loss of miR-200c enhances the aggressiveness of cancer and metastasis and that the replacement of miR-200c inhibits cell growth in several types of tumors, including lung cancer. In this particular study, the team sought to investigate the outcome of the overexpression of the increase miR-200c molecule.

Their findings revealed that the miR-200c overexpression increased cellular radiosensitivity in lung cancer. The antitumor effects of miR-200c, they found, result partially from its regulation of the oxidative stress response. This suggests that micR-200c, in combination with radiation, may represent a therapeutic strategy for the future.

To read more about this study and its findings, please click here.

The LCRF is dedicated to supporting research on innovative strategies for better treatments, screening, and prevention of all cancers of the lung. Our goal is to fund promising scientific and clinical research initiatives that will lead to more positive outcomes and improved quality of like for all lung cancer patients. We commend Dr. Welsh and his colleagues for their work and believe that we are making strides to combat this deadly disease.

Reprinted from the Pathways, Spring 2014. Pathways is LCRF’s Semi-Annual Newsletter.

by Peter B. Bach, MD, MAPP
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

In November 2010, the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) announced results which identified a 20% relative reduction in lung cancer mortality from screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) compared to Chest radiograph. These results, from a large and well-designed randomized controlled trial (RCT), prompted professional societies to advocate the use of LDCT screening in high risk populations. (1-4) Late last year the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) added to this growing body of recommendations. (5)

The USPSTF is an independent group of experts funded and appointed by the federal government which evaluates preventive services. Since 2008 Medicare has been able to cover new preventive services that receive A or B grades from the USPSTF. In 2010, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) mandated the coverage of USPSTF A or B graded services by most private insurance plans and removed coinsurance for Medicare covered services. (6) In light of this expanded role, the processes used by the Task Force to develop their recommendations are of increased importance.

The USPSTF bases its grading system on a service’s expected net benefit and the certainty of that benefit. A potential weakness of this strategy is that it treats the net benefit determination as constant throughout the population. Even within the NLST eligible population there is a wide range of expected net-benefit from LDCT screening. A recent study has suggested that the number of false positive results per prevented lung cancer death (a measure of net-benefit) from LDCT screening varied 25-fold between low and high risk NLST participants. (7) A more nuanced set of recommendations would assign different grades to these high and low risk individuals.

Following several guidelines released by professional societies, the USPSTF also recommended screening for a group not studied in the NLST, 75-80 year olds with a substantial smoking history. The USPSTF relied on disease state models to provide evidence for this recommendation, extrapolating the NLST results to older individuals. Such extrapolation is considered to be lower quality evidence than RCTs or observational studies, implying that the certainty of the net benefit in this population is also lower. Ideally the grading of the recommendation to screen 75-80 year olds would reflect this.

There is strong evidence that LDCT screening for lung cancer is beneficial for individuals at high risk of developing the disease. However, this benefit will vary significantly from person to person. Despite largely following previous guidelines, the USPSTF’s recommendation lacks the parsimony necessary to communicate this critical point.

_____________________________________________________________________

References

1. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, Azzoli CG, Berry DA, Brawley OW, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2418-29.
2. Jaklitsch MT, Jacobson FL, Austin JH, Field JK, Jett JR, Keshavjee S, et al. The American Association for Thoracic Surgery guidelines for lung cancer screening using low-dose computed tomography scans for lung cancer survivors and other high-risk groups. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(1):33-8.
3. Wender R, Fontham ET, Barrera E, Jr., Colditz GA, Church TR, Ettinger DS, et al. American Cancer Society lung cancer screening guidelines. CA Cancer J Clin. 2013;63(2):107-17.
4. Wood DE, Eapen GA, Ettinger DS, Hou L, Jackman D, Kazerooni E, et al. Lung cancer screening. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2012;10(2):240-65.
5. Moyer VA. Screening for Lung Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2013.
6. Bach PB. Raising the Bar for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2013.
7. Kovalchik SA, Tammemagi M, Berg CD, Caporaso NE, Riley TL, Korch M, et al. Targeting of low-dose CT screening according to the risk of lung-cancer death. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(3):245-54.

Knowledge about the genetic mutations that cause tumors is offering the first real promise of drugs that can control lung cancer.

Medical Advisory Board Member and 2007 LCRF grantee Roy Herbst, MD, PhD, is quoted in a Wall Street Journal article that discusses how knowledge about the genetic mutations that cause tumors is offering the first real promise of drugs that can control lung cancer. LCRF has funded many studies to support the study of targeted therapies. Read the full article here.

In written testimony to Congress on March 28, ASCO President Clifford A. Hudis, MD, FACP, urged legislators to provide $5.26 billion to the National Cancer Institute and $32 billion to the National Institutes of Health for fiscal year 2015, to renew the nation’s commitment to clinical cancer research, “without which our basic science findings would never help improve the lives of patients.”

New view of tumors’ evolution

Anne Trafton, MIT News Office
March 13, 2014

Cancer cells undergo extensive genetic alterations as they grow and spread through the body. Some of these mutations, known as “drivers,” help spur cells to grow out of control, while others (“passengers”) are merely along for the ride.

MIT cancer biologists at the Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and geneticists from the Broad Institute have now performed the most comprehensive analysis to date of these changes in mice programmed to develop cancer. The team discovered mutations and other genetic disturbances that arise at certain stages of lung cancer development; the researchers were also able to identify tumor cells that broke free to spread to other organs.

The findings, described in the March 13 issue of Cell, suggest possible new targets for drugs for this aggressive form of cancer, known as small cell lung cancer. There are now very few targeted drugs for small cell lung cancer, a highly lethal form of lung cancer that is associated with tobacco use and is usually treated with chemotherapy drugs that have severe side effects.

“Right now, small cell lung cancer is really lagging behind with respect to therapies that target a specific mutation or genetic alteration in the tumors, because we don’t know a lot about the drivers in these cancers,” says David McFadden, a postdoc at MIT’s Koch Institute for Integrative Cancer Research and one of the lead authors of the Cell paper.

Other lead authors of the paper are Koch Institute postdoc Thales Papagiannakopoulos and Broad Institute researchers Amaro Taylor-Weiner, Chip Stewart, and Scott Carter. Senior authors are Tyler Jacks, the David H. Koch Professor of Biology and director of the Koch Institute, and Gad Getz, director of cancer genome computational analysis at the Broad Institute and director of the bioinformatics program at Massachusetts General Hospital.

Tracking cancer progression

The research team studied a strain of mice that lacks two key tumor-suppressor genes, p53 and Rb. These mice develop small cell lung cancer, but scientists don’t know exactly how the cancer progresses or which subsequent genetic alterations drive tumor growth.

In studies of human small cell lung cancer, it has been difficult to identify these driver mutations because potent carcinogens in cigarette smoke produce many mutations, most of which don’t affect tumor growth. In the mouse model of the disease, fewer mutations arise because the mice are not exposed to cigarette smoke, making it easier to identify the key drivers.

Mice lacking p53 and Rb, the two most commonly mutated tumor suppressors in human small cell lung cancer, develop lung tumors that closely mimic the progression of human small cell lung cancer. These tumors are highly metastatic and usually spread to the lymph nodes near the lungs and then to the liver. The researchers isolated DNA from these tumors and analyzed the genetic alterations that occurred, including genetic mutations as well as changes in the number of copies of a gene or chromosome.

First, the researchers compared genetic alterations that appeared early and late in cancer development. They found that early on, tumors accumulate many extra copies of a gene called Mycl1, a known oncogene that helps cells ignore signals to stop growing. Because Mycl1 is mutated so early, it is found in nearly all of the tumor cells, making it a good drug target, McFadden says. There are currently no cancer treatments that specifically target Mycl1, but scientists are now working on drugs that target a closely related oncogene, MYC.

Later in tumor progression, the mouse cancer cells lose a gene called Pten, which has previously been found mutated in about 20 percent of small cell lung cancer patients. In normal cells, Pten regulates a critical signaling pathway called PI3K, which influences many aspects of cell growth and survival. When Pten is lost, the pathway becomes overactive, allowing tumor cells to grow very rapidly.

Drugs that target the PI3K pathway are now in the early stages of clinical testing in human patients.

Retracing metastasis

The researchers also compared the genomes of cells from the original lung tumors and from tumors that later appeared in other sites. This enabled them to retrace the tumor cells’ paths and to determine which lung tumors were the sources of the metastases. They found that while multiple subsets of cells from the lung tumors could move to the lymph nodes, usually only a single subset from the lymph nodes spread to the liver.

“Our data really add to this emerging idea that metastatic spread is quite complicated, and that there may be different populations within a single cancer moving around to different sites, which may complicate treatments,” McFadden says.

The approach taken by the MIT and Broad team offers a unique opportunity to study the mechanisms that underlie lung cancer development and spread, says Anton Berns, a research group leader at the Netherlands Cancer Institute.

“This is of interest, as it can reveal that there might or might not be a specific route, and that there is a specific order in which selections for mutations do take place. In this regard this is a landmark paper,” says Berns, who was not part of the research team. “It is a beautiful, detailed dissection of tumor development in the mouse, carefully executed with great attention for what such a system can teach.”

The researchers now hope to perform further genetic analysis to identify which mutations make certain cells more likely to metastasize. They also plan to try treating small cell lung tumors with chemotherapy drugs and observing the genetic changes that occur as cancer cells become resistant to treatment.

The study was funded by the Ludwig Center for Molecular Oncology at MIT, the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, the National Human Genome Research Institute, a National Institutes of Health-National Cancer Institute Career Development Award, and a Hope Funds for Cancer Research Fellowship.

Reposted from: http://news.mit.edu/2014/new-view-of-tumors-evolut…